What do you mean by looking after? dave On Wed, 12 Jul 2000, you wrote: > Hi, > > In Bordeaux some people criticized us for delivering non-free software > like Netscape in our first CD that we label "GPL Edition" is its > standalone version. > > Now we have a (rather funny) idea : why not trying to see if it's > possible to build up a 100% GPL product? This would involve removing > anything but GPL-ized stuff, that is XFree86, apache, etc. > > Does anyone here is interested in looking after this product? > > > -- > "Pixel, il faut mettre un peu de chaleur dans tes contacts humains" (c) Titi -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux Registration #182490 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= LINUX - Why? Cause I dont do windows or ovens! -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
- [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Linux-Mandrake distro (... Guillaume Cottenceau
- RE: [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Linux-Mandrake... Geoffrey Lee
- Re: [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Linux-Mand... Guillaume Cottenceau
- RE: [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Linux-... Geoffrey Lee
- RE: [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Li... David Walluck
- Re: [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Li... Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Linux-Mandrake... Armisis Aieoln
- Re: [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Linux-Mand... Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Linux-Mandrake... john . cavan
- Re: [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Linux-Mand... Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Linux-... Pablo Saratxaga
- Re: [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Linux-... David Walluck
- Re: [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Li... Graham Percival
- Re: [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Linux-Mand... Pixel
- Re: [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Linux-Mandrake... Eric MC.D
