"Geoffrey Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > i think that, i wold be more interested in a "open-source" distribution or > better still, a "free" distro where "free" is the "free" as defined by the > Free Software Foundation. that would mean no Qt libs, or pine ... I don't know for Pine -- but for Qt, RMS clearly said in the conference in Bordeaux that now it is "free" software. -- "Pixel, il faut mettre un peu de chaleur dans tes contacts humains" (c) Titi
- [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Linux-Mandrake distro (... Guillaume Cottenceau
- RE: [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Linux-Mandrake... Geoffrey Lee
- Re: [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Linux-Mand... Guillaume Cottenceau
- RE: [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Linux-... Geoffrey Lee
- RE: [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Li... David Walluck
- Re: [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Li... Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Linux-Mandrake... Armisis Aieoln
- Re: [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Linux-Mand... Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Linux-Mandrake... john . cavan
- Re: [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Linux-Mand... Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Linux-... Pablo Saratxaga
- Re: [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Linux-... David Walluck
- Re: [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Li... Graham Percival
- Re: [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Linux-Mand... Pixel
