"Geoffrey Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> i think that, i wold be more interested in a "open-source" distribution or
> better still, a "free" distro where "free" is the "free" as defined by the
> Free Software Foundation. that would mean no Qt libs, or pine ...

I don't know for Pine -- but for Qt, RMS clearly said in the conference in
Bordeaux that now it is "free" software.


-- 
"Pixel, il faut mettre un peu de chaleur dans tes contacts humains" (c) Titi

Reply via email to