Ah... I guess I was incorrectly viewing how Linux manages its RAM. I do find it odd, though, that X will use up an extra 50MB's, seemingly, if left alone for 12 hours. I say this, because I rebooted at like midnight and it showed like 80MB used, then I went to bed and when I got up and checked around noon it said 125MB used. If I'm not opening programs how is that explained? X just grows? JJ Leon Brooks wrote: > > That's normal. The RAM ``useage'' fills up as quickly as possible, since Linux > is loathe to have any of its RAM unemployed (ie it doesn't expend effort kicking > stuff out of RAM unless it has a reason).
- Re: [Cooker] 7.2beta. nfs daemon STILL not being st... Pixel
- Re: [Cooker] 7.2beta. nfs daemon STILL not being st... Ron Stodden
- [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Joshua Jackson
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Leon Brooks
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Joshua Jackson
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Leon Brooks
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Ron Stodden
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Joshua Jackson
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Leon Brooks
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Joshua Jackson
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Leon Brooks
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Joshua Jackson
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Joshua Jackson
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Francis Galiegue
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Alexander Skwar
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Leon Brooks
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Joshua Jackson
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Leon Brooks
- Re: [Cooker] OT - Ram Management Meir Faraj
