Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > In case you didn't notice, I'm not a kernel packager. Well I'll gladly admit that I am ignorant. But the policy of waiting to introduce new kernels into Cooker must mean that someone have concluded that all future problems with Cooker is not related to problems already existent in the kernel. What is the good thing, please related to pb's, with not introducing a better kernel? regards guran
- [Cooker] No need to test on old kernel guran
- Re: [Cooker] No need to test on old kernel guran
- Re: [Cooker] No need to test on old kernel Alexander Skwar
- Re: [Cooker] No need to test on old kernel Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] No need to test on old kern... guran
- Re: [Cooker] No need to test on old ... Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] No need to test on... guran
- Re: [Cooker] No need to tes... guran
- Re: [Cooker] No need to... Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] No need to... Juan Quintela
- Re: [Cooker] No need to... guran
- Re: [Cooker] No need to tes... J . A . Magallon
- RE: [Cooker] No need to... Andrej Borsenkow
- Re: [Cooker] No need to... guran
- Re: [Cooker] No need to... Juan Quintela
- RE: [Cooker] No need to test on old ... Andrej Borsenkow
