> > Anyways, cooker is cooker, and it could perfectly include the -ac > kernel a few > hours after release, but then do not send any mail claiming 'my disk was > toasted by latest mdk kernel' Eh? "Do not send bug reports"? What are you talking about? Cooker is there so that people can test new versions as soon as possible *and* report any bugs found. At least I hoped so. . And it is hard to build a kernel > each even day. > For stable use, I would prefer the Linus pre series. It usually > only includes > bug fixes or very well tested changes (note, 'usually'...). > Who speaks about "stable use" of cooker? -andrej
- Re: [Cooker] No need to test on old kernel Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] No need to test on old kernel guran
- Re: [Cooker] No need to test on old kernel Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] No need to test on old kern... guran
- Re: [Cooker] No need to test on old ... guran
- Re: [Cooker] No need to test on... Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] No need to test on... Juan Quintela
- Re: [Cooker] No need to test on... guran
- Re: [Cooker] No need to test on old ... J . A . Magallon
- Re: [Cooker] No need to test on... Andrej Borsenkow
- Re: [Cooker] No need to test on... guran
- Re: [Cooker] No need to test on... Juan Quintela
- RE: [Cooker] No need to test on old kernel Andrej Borsenkow
- Re: [Cooker] No need to test on old kern... guran
- Re: [Cooker] No need to test on old kern... Pixel
- Re: [Cooker] No need to test on old ... guran
- Re: [Cooker] No need to test on old ... Blue Lizard
- Re: [Cooker] No need to test on... Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] No need to test on old kern... David Odin
- Re: [Cooker] No need to test on old kernel Randy Kramer
