On Friday 06 July 2001 00:23, you wrote: > It is the kind of explanation that you wanted? Thanks, I read kernel-traffic every weak and must have missed the full implications of Alan's remark. regards guran
- Re: [Cooker] No need to test on old kernel Alexander Skwar
- Re: [Cooker] No need to test on old kernel Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] No need to test on old kernel guran
- Re: [Cooker] No need to test on old kernel Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] No need to test on old kern... guran
- Re: [Cooker] No need to test on old ... guran
- Re: [Cooker] No need to test on... Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] No need to test on... Juan Quintela
- Re: [Cooker] No need to test on... guran
- Re: [Cooker] No need to test on old ... J . A . Magallon
- RE: [Cooker] No need to test on... Andrej Borsenkow
- Re: [Cooker] No need to test on... guran
- Re: [Cooker] No need to test on... Juan Quintela
- RE: [Cooker] No need to test on old kernel Andrej Borsenkow
- Re: [Cooker] No need to test on old kern... guran
- Re: [Cooker] No need to test on old kern... Pixel
- Re: [Cooker] No need to test on old ... guran
- Re: [Cooker] No need to test on old ... Blue Lizard
- Re: [Cooker] No need to test on... Guillaume Cottenceau
