On Sat, 23 Feb 2002, Jason Straight wrote: > majority are the most annoying linux users in the world who do nothing > but complain about Redhat and Mandrake, they say this or that about it, > but when you call their bluff and ask them to show you why it sucks they > can't. > > So after all the bitching about Debian this or Slackware that I tried > both of them, I liked the simple straight forward installs on both ok, > slackware was fine. Debian was ok, fast install but the apps were older > than Jesus, and updating with apt-get to testing or unstable broke the > system, and apt itself would die 4-6 times during the updates. Got real > old after about 10 installs on Debian. I seeked help on IRC to make sure > I was doing it all right and all the Debianholes and Slacksuckers who > said their distro's were so superior to Mandrake couldn't explain why > Debian was sucking. Slackware was ok, but I wouldn't say superior. Why > can't mandrake just be mandrake? > > It rocks just the way it is - why debianize it? > > > I agree, the debian users ive met are very much bullheaded ppl who say debian rulez and regard all other distros as total crap not even worthy of being called linux. Yet when you install a debian stable release its like going back to about 1998, its all old as hell. I mean 2.2.19? gimmee a break! Mandrake is fine like it is! -- "After I bit the head off the bat, the animal rights people came after me every night. Probably right after they finished eating their Colonel Sandersor whatever, telling me I shouldn't be biting the heads off bats. I'll tellyou what bats taste like. Like a good McDonald's."-Ozzy Osbourne (1985)
Chad Young Registered Linux User #195191 @ http://counter.li.org ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Linux localhost 2.4.18-rc4 #1 Fri Feb 22 12:20:04 AST 2002 i686 unknown 1:05am up 23 min, 1 user, load average: 0.09, 0.06, 0.04
