On Thursday 14 March 2002 11:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I do not think this topic belongs on this list, but since you keep
> all going on about it, here is my 2 cents.
>
>
> I agree completly with mdks policy not to put KDE3.0 in main distro.
> BUT
>
> I fail to understand why packages like KDE3 and moz 0.9.9 are not
> build for members of the mandrake club.

Maybe, time?

Don't forget we already said that KDE 3 packages will be available for 
8.0, 8.1, 8.2 and Cooker. Please just wait for a final release.



> This would convice many
> people to join the club. As you can read in the press, some people
> think mandrake begs for money because the club gives not enough
> extra's. I think I agree about the not enough extra's part. Texstars
> webpage offers much more to many people than mdk club and it is free.

/.../

Texstar's Web page offers KDE 2 packages builded with objprelink. This 
is not a good idea at all if you want stability.

Most of packages available on Texstar's Web page are already in Cooker 
or Contribs.

Some packages available on Texstar's Web page are propriaritary 
software and require an agreement of their owners to be offered on such 
Web page.


-- 
David BAUDENS
MandrakeSoft - http://www.mandrakesoft.com

Reply via email to