On Montag, 18. M�rz 2002 15:20:15, Buchan Milne wrote: > Brad Felmey wrote: > | On Sat, 2002-03-16 at 02:11, Warly wrote: > |>Brad Felmey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > |>>On Fri, 2002-03-15 at 09:17, Hoyt wrote: > |>>>Perhaps if you attach some money to the message, they will bother to > > read it > > |>>>and fix the bugs. 8) > |>> > |>>I attached $60, but 8.2 is still going out the door with an oopsing > |>>smbfs. > |> > |>On this topic, I try to unsuccessfully reproduce the pb, and ask to our > |>local tester to reproduce, but do not manage to. Do you have a simple > |>testcase to reproduce it? > | > | Mount something, copy something. I can reproduce it on about a bazillion > | Mdk machines here at work. I don't know what else I can tell you. It's > | not my imagination. I've posted the oops and output from ksymoops, are > | these not useful? > > I have posted this before, but Juan has applied the patch (which I > posted a while back) to the update kernel. Could you test with this > kernel and see if it fixes your problem: > > http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~quintela/update/ > > Also, testing the newer samba package is also worthwhile. > > If someone can confirm that the kernel fixes the problem, then there is > at least some reason to put the updated kernel in (although it is > probably too late).
Confirmed! "smbmount //server/share mountdir -o codepage=iso8859-1 && ls mountdir" now works without segfault of ls or kernel oops. Hope, you can push that kernel version into final release. > > And since there are only a few people that can reproduce the problem, > one of those people must test it. If I could reproduce it, I would have > tested it by now ... > > Buchan.
