Le Lundi 1 Juillet 2002 09:08, Fran�ois Pons a �crit :
> Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Shouldn't urpmq act as 'what would have similar urpmi command done ?'
> > However, it is obviously different:
> > [root@silbermann guillaume]# urpmq squirrelmail
> > squirrelmail
> > [root@silbermann guillaume]# urpmi squirrelmail
> > Some package have to be removed for others to be upgraded:
> > postfix-1.1.10-2mdk
> > do you agree ? (O/n) n
> > Pour satisfaire les d�pendances, les paquetages suivants vont �tre
> > install�s (7 Mo):
> > php-4.2.1-7mdk.i586
> > squirrelmail-1.2.7-3mdk.noarch
> > ssmtp-2.50.3-2mdk.i586
> > Est-ce correct ? (O/n) n
>
> This is a limitation for urpmq because it is not interactive.
If the goal is just to have a what-if tool, what about dropping urpmq and
adding a --dry-run option to urpmi instead ?
--
Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPG key http://lis.snv.jussieu.fr/~rousse/gpgkey.html
