On Wednesday 21 August 2002 03:27, Ben Reser wrote: > On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 11:24:12AM +1000, Ron Stodden wrote: > > No good. It cannot be done for two good reasons:
> That's silly to expect that there should be a freeze. cooker is the > distribution as it stands right now on it's way to a release. cooker is > used as the repository to build it against. cooker allows the > developers to post fixes for beta issues. etc etc etc... > No, I think it is entirely reasonable to expect a freeze, or at least have non-essential Cooker updates parked between beta cycles. ie. BETA1 Cooker frozen for 1 week, re-opens for a week after that, then BETA2 etc, etc, etc till we get to RC
