Charles A Edwards wrote:
> On 03 Oct 2002 16:13:16 +0200
> Guillaume Cottenceau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>I think that's not really true. When generating the hdlists, we
>>check for conflicts, provides etc. This is the first step. Second
>>step, during install, we suppose conflicts have been checked, so
>>we prefer installing with a few conflictsm rather than refusing
>>to install anything.
>
>
> I grant that, but during installation every pkg that is selected will be
> installed irregardless of any conflict which may exist.
That is probably necessary when RPMs have circular dependencies.
But the proper solution for that is to co-install such RPMs in one run
of urpmi or kpackage.
--
Ron. [Melbourne, Australia]
IMPORTANT! troels... for ML 9.0 now available. See my web site:
http://members.optusnet.com.au/ronst/
