On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 10:42:08AM -0600, Vincent Danen wrote: > I say the second one... but make the unsupported dirs urpmiable also > then. We need to leverage urpmi wherever we can. It would also, > clearly, make sense to me that these are specifically labelled as > unsupported (thus no updates/ subdir). No advisories will go out (from > me) regarding them. > > If folks want to post something to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or > [EMAIL PROTECTED] with their "homebrewn" advisory regarding > these unsupported updates, that is fine.
How about: unsupported/contrib-updates It's more clear what the updates are for and being in the unsupported tree it should be clear that they are not supported. WDYT? -- Ben Reser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://ben.reser.org "If you're not making any mistakes, you're flat out not trying hard enough." - Jim Nichols
