On Thursday, October 24, 2002, at 02:14 PM, Ben Reser wrote:

I say the second one... but make the unsupported dirs urpmiable also
then. We need to leverage urpmi wherever we can. It would also,
clearly, make sense to me that these are specifically labelled as
unsupported (thus no updates/ subdir). No advisories will go out (from
me) regarding them.

If folks want to post something to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with their "homebrewn" advisory regarding
these unsupported updates, that is fine.
How about:
unsupported/contrib-updates

It's more clear what the updates are for and being in the unsupported
tree it should be clear that they are not supported.  WDYT?
That works for me...  Warly?

--
MandrakeSoft Security; http://www.mandrakesecure.net/
"lynx - source http://linsec.ca/vdanen.asc | gpg --import"
{FE6F2AFD: 88D8 0D23 8D4B 3407 5BD7 66F9 2043 D0E5 FE6F 2AFD}

Attachment: PGP.sig
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to