On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 12:01:57PM -0700, Vincent Danen wrote: > There should then be a cooker-discuss list or something that is > strictly for cooker discussion and *no* bug reports. Keep cooker as > the place to discuss bugs and receive bug reports. > > Of course, the usefulness of cooker-discuss would be greatly diminished > due to the fact it would just have all the noise from this list... > flames, politics, etc. The cooker list, by nature, should be > discussing bugs/problems to begin with, which should all be routed via > bugzilla for accounting purposes.
It's going to be much easier to move the bug email (which is being generated by bugzilla) to a different list than to get people to have discussions on a different list. I advocated a cooker-bugs list for the bugzilla mail... All bugs would then go to that list. Discussions would take place here. Comments on bugs should go via bugzilla and not to any list (right now we have some people, including Mandrake employees, sending their replies to the list, while bugzilla will pick them up you end up with 2 copies of the message when bugzilla reposts it to the list). People shouldn't be replying to this list for bug reports, but to the <bugid>@qa.linux-mandrake.com lists. So cooker-bugs would be a closed list. Anyone reporting a bug on the main cooker list should be redirected to bugzilla. -- Ben Reser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://ben.reser.org "If you're not making any mistakes, you're flat out not trying hard enough." - Jim Nichols
