I heartily agree with the concept that Mandrake should charge for ISOs
until they can extract themselves from their current problems. I also
suggest the following:
1) Move Mandrake Club membership to sliding scale roughly in line with
typical anual income of member's country of residence. This is not
easy, but it COULD be done with a little effort.
2) Allow for payment by check or money order. Some countries simply
don't support the sophisticated credit card infrastructure we have in
the west.
3) Allow for monthly payments, but require six months of membership
before certain benifits begin to become available. That would allow the
user to commit and begin to enjoy some benefits while protecting
Mandrake from unethical users who pay one month's membership, grab all
the goodies and disappear.
4) Right now a major attraction of the club is the RPM request venue.
This enables users to vote on new packages they would like to see for
Mandrake. Those items that are popular and can attract a developer
become available quickly to members. This is a GREAT attraction and
benefit. What needs to be added to this is a parallel Bugzilla fast
track for Club members. Members having problems with Mandrake deserve
to be able to vote on which fixes they want prioritized and deserve to
know what the status is on features that don't work (ie supermount,
etc.). This would be a great and attractive feature. Some of us are
getting so tired of the bugs that we no longer appreciate the new
features. The bugs need to be addressed better than they are now.
5) ISOs should be removed from download availability and the current
ISO should be distributable only by Mandrake. Mandrake club membership
should include a complementary GPL ISO. I currently reproduce and sell
Mandrake ISOs, but I would gladly give up this practice if it would
benefit Mandrake. The other option would be for Mandrake to license ISO
resellers and collect a small but reasonable amount for each ISO sold.
The point is not to make a lot of money on each sale, but rather to
make sure each user must contribute something if they want to use the
product. All this can be done while maintaining fairness. Bonafide
developers, for example, should receive complementary basic club
membership, etc. I do think that at some point Mandrake is going to
have to restrict ISOs in order to have the financial health necessary to
move forward. And remember that firming up the business plan will bring
in investors as well. There is a snowball effect and a negative
snowball effect the way things are now.
6) Last but not least, it goes without saying, Mandrake Store needs to
be fixed. AND every user who has been screwed by the Mandrake store
debacle should be sent a gratis GPL Mandrake set and a formal letter of
appology.
Just my sentiments,
George Mitchell
- Re: [Cooker] Saving Mandrake -... Leon Brooks
- Re: [Cooker] Saving Mandrake -... SI Reasoning
- Re: [Cooker] Saving Mandrake -... Leon Brooks
- Re: [Cooker] Saving Mandrake -... andre
- Re: [Cooker] Saving Mandrake - and yet another User... Udo Rader
- Re: [Cooker] Saving Mandrake - a Users Perspective Gary Walsh
- Re: [Cooker] Saving Mandrake - a Users Perspective Ron Stodden
- Re: [Cooker] Saving Mandrake - another User's Perspectiv... George Mitchell
- Re: [Cooker] Saving Mandrake - another User's Persp... Leon Brooks
- Re: [Cooker] Saving Mandrake - another User's P... Jason
- Re: [Cooker] Saving Mandrake - another User's P... Ben Reser
- Re: [Cooker] Saving Mandrake - another User... Charles A Edwards
- Re: [Cooker] Saving Mandrake - older di... Leon Brooks
- Re: [Cooker] Saving Mandrake - old... Guillaume Rousse
- Re: [Cooker] Saving Mandrake - a Users Perspective Chmouel Boudjnah
