-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Bret Baptist wrote: > On Friday 07 March 2003 10:39 am, Frederic Crozat wrote: > >>>So what you are saying is voting for bugs is not as important as >>>commenting on a bug that someone files and making the test case more >>>clear? I would like to be able to do both. :-) >> >>I can only speak for myself but since there isn't enough bug triaging >>(UNCONFIRMED bug tagged as NEW), I have to dig in UNCONFIRMED bugs to see >>if I can reproduce them here... If you find a testcase for an UNCONFIRMED >>bug, post it, it will always help people fixing bugs.. (this is not Mdk >>specific.. :) > > > The moving from UNCONFIRMED to NEW is what I would like to do. One of the > issues I have is that I test a component for bugs (say kdebase). I can only > vote for one bug out of that component. So that means that I can only really > confirm one bug in the system. I can post "Me too's" to a comment on a bug, > but I can not vote for multiple bugs and move them to a NEW or CONFIRMED > state in the system. Does this make any sense? >
Not as much as it could. Saying "me too", or voting/confirming a bug are not really useful unless you can add more insight to it. Better to ensure that when the developer looks at it, that he has something to work with, than to make him look at a whole bunch of bug reports that have information on how to reproduce the bug. MHO of course. Buchan - -- |--------------Another happy Mandrake Club member--------------| Buchan Milne Mechanical Engineer, Network Manager Cellphone * Work +27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x121 Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za GPG Key http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc 1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQE+aNTxrJK6UGDSBKcRAs7sAJ9qkrofpj73NkwXtWXoQsAvrPpSjgCfYXNP UAPABggSdDJn3Mh9B16uS8E= =gzUN -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
