-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Bret Baptist wrote: > On Friday 07 March 2003 11:20 am, Buchan Milne wrote: > > I thought the idea was that if a bug gets voted to a confirmed state than the > developer would have a pretty good idea that the bug is in fact valid.
Sure, but you still want him to be able to reproduce it easily. > > I was also under the impression that if the bug is not in a NEW state that > most developers (pixel, and fcrozat being an exception for sure) don't even > look at it. Is this not the case? > I can't tell you for sure, but I would guess developers look at confirmed bugs first. And of course, you can reduce the time they spend looking at confirmed bugs (to get your unconfirmed bugs looked at possibly) by ensuring that as many bugs as possible are really good. Buchan - -- |--------------Another happy Mandrake Club member--------------| Buchan Milne Mechanical Engineer, Network Manager Cellphone * Work +27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x121 Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za GPG Key http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc 1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQE+aN0ArJK6UGDSBKcRAhAVAKDCibtVm07VeeCpJB/+FtJlfgLCZACfUq+T 21mgs9iHFkl2XWU98rQ15mU= =i1rE -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
