On Fri, 2003-03-07 at 08:39, Frederic Crozat wrote: > On Fri, 07 Mar 2003 10:30:55 -0600, Bret Baptist wrote: > > > On Friday 07 March 2003 10:15 am, Frederic Crozat wrote: > >> I think the BIG problem with UNCONFIRMED bug is their test case scenario : > >> > >> If you check all the bugs I replied to this week, more than 500f reply > >> are : give me reproducible facts, give me testcase, etc... And when I > >> think bug are fixed, I ask people to test and I get no answer in 250f > >> case.. > >> > >> This is really an area where YOU (cooker community) can help.. If I can't > >> reproduce crash/bugs, I can't fix them.. > > > > So what you are saying is voting for bugs is not as important as commenting on > > a bug that someone files and making the test case more clear? I would like > > to be able to do both. :-) > > I can only speak for myself but since there isn't enough bug triaging > (UNCONFIRMED bug tagged as NEW), I have to dig in UNCONFIRMED bugs to see > if I can reproduce them here... If you find a testcase for an UNCONFIRMED > bug, post it, it will always help people fixing bugs.. (this is not Mdk > specific.. :) > > > > PS. What does 500f and 250f mean? > > grrr, this is our news2mail gateway which is broken, it means 50percent > and 25percent :))
Dang and I just thought it was you getting extremely hot under the collar (think Fahrenheit) *grin*
