On 04/01/2014 10:20 PM, Eirik Lygre wrote: >> > > What is the relationship between this "naked dot" proposal and the > "chaining of void methods" proposal? The reason for asking is not to be > negative, but rather to find out if these issues are best dealt with > together, or as independent proposals. > > I think that if either of these are going to happen, then they must be > specified with the appropriate level of isolation: That which belongs > together must be processed together; that which belongs apart must be > processed apart.
Point taken, but Project Coin (small language changes) worked well. Andrew.
