On Thu, 1 May 2025 09:09:16 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore <mcimadam...@openjdk.org>
wrote:
>> Ugh - it's a record, I see. Which brings up the question -- should it be a
>> record? Should it advertize its `size and `tl` components (they seem rather
>> implementation specific?).
>
> Was this done so that the final field could be trusted? (I believe all final
> fields are implicitly trusted in jdk/internal/foreign):
>
>
> holder->is_in_package("jdk/internal/foreign/layout") ||
> holder->is_in_package("jdk/internal/foreign") ||
Yes. We should revert to a normal class.
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24829#discussion_r2071249389
