On Fri, 2 May 2025 10:41:38 GMT, Per Minborg <pminb...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> Updated benchmarks: > > ``` > Benchmark (ELEM_SIZE) Mode Cnt Score Error > Units > BufferStackBench.OfVirtual.buffer 8 avgt 15 12.695 ± 0.205 > ns/op > BufferStackBench.OfVirtual.buffer 16 avgt 15 12.622 ± 0.078 > ns/op > BufferStackBench.OfVirtual.buffer 32 avgt 15 12.523 ± 0.022 > ns/op > BufferStackBench.OfVirtual.confined 8 avgt 15 22.902 ± 0.407 > ns/op > BufferStackBench.OfVirtual.confined 16 avgt 15 23.858 ± 0.652 > ns/op > BufferStackBench.OfVirtual.confined 32 avgt 15 25.544 ± 0.458 > ns/op > BufferStackBench.buffer 8 avgt 15 4.923 ± 0.029 > ns/op > BufferStackBench.buffer 16 avgt 15 4.971 ± 0.095 > ns/op > BufferStackBench.buffer 32 avgt 15 4.980 ± 0.105 > ns/op > BufferStackBench.confined 8 avgt 15 22.713 ± 0.289 > ns/op > BufferStackBench.confined 16 avgt 15 23.576 ± 0.348 > ns/op > BufferStackBench.confined 32 avgt 15 25.272 ± 0.530 > ns/op > ``` > > and > > ``` > Benchmark Mode Cnt Score Error Units > CallOverheadByValue.OfVirtual.byPtr avgt 15 4.159 ± 0.097 ns/op > CallOverheadByValue.OfVirtual.byValue avgt 15 16.535 ± 0.433 ns/op > CallOverheadByValue.byPtr avgt 15 4.119 ± 0.031 ns/op > CallOverheadByValue.byValue avgt 15 11.404 ± 0.240 ns/op > ``` What was the result before this PR? ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24829#issuecomment-2847012659
