On Tue, 17 Jun 2025 08:16:15 GMT, Johannes Döbler <d...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> I am still wondering what this (old) test tries to proof. It is filed below > jdk.onternal.loader.URLClassPath but doesn't use or test URLClassPath, and it > succeeds to construct a Class with an invalid name "fo o". URLClassPath is used in URLClassLoader, so I think this is OK in the current test structure. In any case, any re-examination would need to be done in a separate issue. The scope of this PR is to simply remove the remnants of Applet. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25703#issuecomment-2981931581
