On Fri, 13 Mar 2026 12:55:41 GMT, Volkan Yazici <[email protected]> wrote:

>> David Beaumont has updated the pull request incrementally with one 
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>> 
>>   tidy up static imports for assertions
>
> test/jaxp/javax/xml/jaxp/functional/catalog/CatalogReferCircularityTest.java 
> line 1:
> 
>> 1: /*
> 
> Copyright year needs to be updated.
> 
> Since there are no semantic changes in this file, you can also consider 
> reverting your changes here.

I like the consistency of static imports everywhere. I had actually not spotted 
this was already a JUnit test, hence the copyright not being caught. I'll 
update the year.

> test/jaxp/javax/xml/jaxp/functional/javax/xml/datatype/ptests/DurationTest.java
>  line 201:
> 
>> 199:      */
>> 200:     @ParameterizedTest
>> 201:     @MethodSource("getEqualDurations")
> 
> Since you've already done similar changes, you can consider inlining this 
> using `@CsvSource`.
> 
> There are more places you can exercise `@CsvSource`, I won't mention them all.

I've used `@CvsSource` a bit before and dislike it compared to `@MethodSource`. 
The need for escaping and other things just gets in the way, even if only 
occasionally. There are literally hundreds of places I could use `@CvsSource` 
and I don't fancy manually converting all of them.

> test/jaxp/javax/xml/jaxp/functional/javax/xml/datatype/ptests/DurationTest.java
>  line 477:
> 
>> 475:         int hash1 = duration1.hashCode();
>> 476:         int hash2 = duration2.hashCode();
>> 477:         assertEquals(hash1, hash2, " generated hash1 : " + hash1 + " 
>> generated hash2 : " + hash2);
> 
> Since you've switched from `assertTrue` to `assertEquals`, I doubt if the 
> message carries any extra value anymore.

True, but I don't think it's doing any harm.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/30165#discussion_r2932675840
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/30165#discussion_r2932673492
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/30165#discussion_r2932663635

Reply via email to