On Mon, 16 Mar 2026 13:09:50 GMT, David Beaumont <[email protected]> wrote:

>> Refactor tests in test/jaxp/javax/xml/jaxp/functional/javax/xml to use 
>> junit, along with ancillary utilities and a handful of related tests 
>> elsewhere.
>> 
>> The difficulty in these refactorings is the use of common utilities which 
>> themselves depend on TestNG classes, which are not available when running 
>> JUnit tests. Thus, several bits of functionality in utility classes (esp. 
>> classes in `jaxp.library`) has had to be re-implemented and inlined. This 
>> isn't terrible, since most of these were one line functions (or complex 
>> functions which could be replaced with one line).
>> 
>> Another complexity is accounting for the differences in test lifecycle 
>> management between TestNG and JUnit. A few classes needed to exploit the 
>> lifecycle and execution modes for single setup and single threaded operation.
>> 
>> Finally, the move from "expected exceptions" on the whole test method to 
>> using `assertThrows` threw up a lot of issues where tests weren't testing 
>> what they claimed (the exception was not being thrown by the final statement 
>> in the test). For these tests I've simplified them (rewriting them entirely 
>> in some cases) but they now test what they claim to be testing and are much 
>> clearer about where assertions are made.
>> 
>> However, because these tests affect the thrown exceptions in test method 
>> signatures, I ran a tidyup to remove all unused exceptions from method 
>> signatures (rather than spending hours manually removing the effected 
>> subset).
>
> David Beaumont has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
> commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Switch to forward slashes in directory strings

d5e10c30 LGTM.

-------------

Marked as reviewed by vyazici (Reviewer).

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/30165#pullrequestreview-3953771888

Reply via email to