On Tue, 10 Mar 2026 11:32:12 GMT, David Beaumont <[email protected]> wrote:

> Refactor tests in test/jaxp/javax/xml/jaxp/functional/javax/xml to use junit, 
> along with ancillary utilities and a handful of related tests elsewhere.
> 
> The difficulty in these refactorings is the use of common utilities which 
> themselves depend on TestNG classes, which are not available when running 
> JUnit tests. Thus, several bits of functionality in utility classes (esp. 
> classes in `jaxp.library`) has had to be re-implemented and inlined. This 
> isn't terrible, since most of these were one line functions (or complex 
> functions which could be replaced with one line).
> 
> Another complexity is accounting for the differences in test lifecycle 
> management between TestNG and JUnit. A few classes needed to exploit the 
> lifecycle and execution modes for single setup and single threaded operation.
> 
> Finally, the move from "expected exceptions" on the whole test method to 
> using `assertThrows` threw up a lot of issues where tests weren't testing 
> what they claimed (the exception was not being thrown by the final statement 
> in the test). For these tests I've simplified them (rewriting them entirely 
> in some cases) but they now test what they claim to be testing and are much 
> clearer about where assertions are made.
> 
> However, because these tests affect the thrown exceptions in test method 
> signatures, I ran a tidyup to remove all unused exceptions from method 
> signatures (rather than spending hours manually removing the effected subset).

This pull request has now been integrated.

Changeset: 318646a6
Author:    David Beaumont <[email protected]>
URL:       
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/commit/318646a6b4559e93722937c97329a9d710b59479
Stats:     2495 lines in 48 files changed: 442 ins; 814 del; 1239 mod

8379626: Refactor jaxp/functional/javax/xml tests to use JUnit

Reviewed-by: vyazici, joehw

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/30165

Reply via email to