On 04/08/08 21:36 +0200, Uwe Hermann wrote: > On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 07:56:03PM +0200, Peter Stuge wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 07:50:32PM +0200, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > > > > a patch to apply on top of Ron's commit. > > > > > > If I'm successful, I'll be undoing 50% of Ron's patch. > > > > That doesn't matter. This is early work in progress. > > Key word: progress > > Doesn't mean we have to commit everything right away though, too. A > certain amount of time for reviews and discussions before committing > anything is needed and a good idea (doesn't have to be weeks, but at > least a few hours or a day or so shouldn't be a problem). > > (I'm not commenting on this specific patch or technical issue, but I > cannot agree with the general idea of "no delays, commit everything ASAP > no matter what").
We need to find the middle ground. Development doesn't have to stop for everybody to give the patch a checkmark. We do _not_ need to be on the same page for the project to proceed. Discussion is good, but not mandatory. Jordan -- Jordan Crouse Systems Software Development Engineer Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. -- coreboot mailing list [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
