On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 06:20:49PM -0700, ron minnich wrote: > Committed revision 720.
Cool. > We need to rethink the PCI config stuff per Stepan's comment, in > part because the device tree now includes things that are NOT PCI > devices. Stepan's suggestion, to make the functions take busdevfn > as the parameter, makes a lot of sense. Didn't we want to use a flat tree in early code? Was that just me? //Peter -- coreboot mailing list [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
