On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 1:40 PM, Stefan Reinauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The obvious question: Do we need to use device_t as an input to that > function at all? Why don't we instead use simple pci functions taking a u32 > as an input? We're a bios, after all, not an OS. Are we? That's a fine question. The convention could be that we call those functions as follows: blahblah(device->bus, device->devfn, etc. etc. ) works for me. But let's revisit it later. I am fine with overloading but only in languages that really allow it ;-) ron -- coreboot mailing list [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
