On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 08:34:12AM +0200, Patrick Georgi wrote:
> Am 16.05.2009 04:01, schrieb Kevin O'Connor:
> >>+
> >>+#if HAVE_HIGH_TABLES == 1
> >>+ high_tables_base = (tolmk - HIGH_TABLES_SIZE) * 1024;
> >>+ high_tables_size = HIGH_TABLES_SIZE* 1024;
> >>+ printk_debug("tom: %lx, high_tables_base: %llx,
> >>high_tables_size: %llx\n", tomk*1024, high_tables_base, high_tables_size);
> >>+#endif
> >>+
> >
> >The above is not correct. It places the high tables over the vga
> >memory.
> Shouldn't VGA memory be excluded from tolmk, too?
IT should already have been excluded from there. On the cle266 (vt8263),
it is counted off right before this blob.
This makes me wonder... why is this HIGH_TABLES stuff done in the ram
controller code and not general? Is this just a transitional phase and
will this be done generally?
Luc Verhaegen.
--
coreboot mailing list: [email protected]
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
