On 26.01.20 21:09, Nico Huber wrote: > Hi Martin, > > On 26.01.20 20:36, Martin Roth wrote: >> While it's not my preference, I'm fine with pulling picasso out of the >> tree and doing the development in private if that's the community >> desire. When we're done, it can go in, or not, as the coreboot >> community chooses. Because we can't boot what's in coreboot >> currently, we're being forced to develop the platforms in private >> anyway. >> >> I'd like to note that the only reason it's "Rotting" is because we >> weren't able to get the patches in to get it working. Sure, they >> weren't perfect, but it's a new and different architecture. Instead >> of forcing google to develop it in private so that we can have >> something working, maybe we could have gotten something working into >> the codebase, then improved upon it. >> >> Maybe have a look at what's being forced on us before complaining >> about how we're going about it? > > I'm really confused now, you are the third one that argues that > build tests would force you to work in private. I don't see the > causality here. > > Why is it easier to work in public when you have a stale copy of your > platform on the master branch instead of the start of your commit queue? > > Or am I just to irritated to unterstand... do you mean > private => Gerrit > public => master branch?
Argh, sorry, forget all I said. I read your mail in the wrong context (got lost between email threads). If it's not too much to ask for, please top quote. Nico _______________________________________________ coreboot mailing list -- coreboot@coreboot.org To unsubscribe send an email to coreboot-le...@coreboot.org
