Hey Martin, On 26.01.20 21:21, Martin Roth wrote: > The picasso platforms are being worked on in a private repo because > it's not bootable at coreboot.org. It's not bootable because the > patches that would make it bootable were delayed and rejected.
I'm sorry that you had trouble with your patches. I didn't know about it. > > What's the incentive to work on anything at coreboot.org? Why should > any company work at coreboot.org when we just get complaints and > grief? Idealistic goals aside, one can get their code maintained for free! I think there is also great value in working together. One gets a code review for free. Which is, IMHO, one third of the development costs. I can't say what was going wrong with Picasso. I turned my back on it after the very first commit scared me away, so I really missed the last half year. Maybe the grief came because complaints were ignored? maybe not? Not a single mail passed the mailing list, how are people supposed to know? > > Personally, I'm tired of dealing with it. It's become too toxic, so > I'm retiring from the project. Sad to hear that. Especially because I seem to have triggered it. Believe me, when I tried to discuss the binary situation, I had no idea about the feelings that already piled up on Gerrit (or in private conversations, what do I know). Nico _______________________________________________ coreboot mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
