Carsten, Personal feel is that we get everything as polished as possible and wait for NIST to finalize. Main reason being that parameters could refine slightly.
Definitely open on title feedback as I am new to this. Mike Prorock mesur.io On Thu, Jul 28, 2022, 15:40 Carsten Bormann <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2022-07-28, at 21:33, Mike Jones <Michael.Jones= > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > As recorded in the IETF 114 COSE meeting minutes, a decision was made to > call for adoption of draft-prorock-cose-post-quantum-signatures as a > working group document. This note starts a two-week call for adoption – > ending on Thursday, August 11th. > > > > Please reply either expressing support for adoption or stating your > objections. > > I believe this is good work to do and we should adopt the document as a > start. > > The following two comments are not roadblocks to adoption: > > Did we discuss the target state of this document? > (For a standards-track document, we would need references that are can be > used in a normative way. Do we want to wait with publishing until these > are available? Can we convince ourselves and others that the references > are good to go?) > > Oh, and we could have a less confusing title. > > Grüße, Carsten > >
_______________________________________________ COSE mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose
