> Personal feel is that we get everything as polished as possible and wait for 
> NIST to finalize.  Main reason being that parameters could refine slightly.

Right.  I think we need to state this direction in the document an even 
summarize it in the abstract.

We also may need to find a way to install provisional registrations for an 
extended period of time; I haven’t thought about that, but that may at some 
point a conversation that the chairs need to have with ADs and IANA.

> Definitely open on title feedback as I am new to this.

The first thing was that I wondered what a JSON-only document does in COSE :-)
True, mathematically speaking the JSON data model is a subset of that of CBOR, 
but…
The abstract and introduction clarified that quickly, but the title may need to 
stand on its own.

Grüße, Carsten

_______________________________________________
COSE mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose

Reply via email to