On 8/5/22 14:58, Carsten Bormann wrote:
252 CBOR tagged
With some text like:
The CBOR tagged type indicates a certificate as specified
by a CBOR Tag [RFC8949]. The certificate section contains the CBOR
encoded representation of a CBOR Tag that contains the certificate
as its Tag content. The Tag number indicates the specific format.
Now we need a draft. You, me, or cose-cbor-encoded-cert author as initial
author of draft?
I can certainly write (when I’m back in the office in W33), but I’d like
someone with 4398 chops as main author.
What is W33?
How do we find out who that would be? The RFC says "Network Working
Group", but
https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/
Does not list such a beast.
What workgroup should 'own' this?
Let secdispatch decide. I have a weak preference for CBOR, but COSE would WFM
too.
I guess I have to join the secdispatch list.
Tomorrow.
We start it here and make noise on some appropriate other list to see who wakes
up?
Yes.
And I want this for draft-ietf-drip-registries as well.
I know even less about the various corners of the universe touched here… But
looks like a fun tour.
Yes!
_______________________________________________
COSE mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose
