> My reading is that we can have +cose for the cost of an Expert Review. > application/cose is already registered. > My next message is about that. I expected: ... +suffix: +cose ... On 4/7/23, 9:50 AM, "RATS on behalf of Michael Richardson" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> on behalf of [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Name: application/cwt +suffix: +cwt References: rfc8392 Encoding considerations: CBOR is always encoded as binary Interoperability considerations: None Fragment identifier considerations: N/A Security considerations: as per RFC8392 Contact: IETF COSE WG Author/Change controller: IESG (I was writing an ID for this, then realized that application/cwt was already a thing, and that all we needed was a suffix, which is Expert Review) -- Michael Richardson <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide _______________________________________________ COSE mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose
