On Fri, Apr 7, 2023 at 5:50 PM Michael Richardson <[email protected]> wrote: > Name: application/cwt > +suffix: +cwt > References: rfc8392 > Encoding considerations: CBOR is always encoded as binary > Interoperability considerations: None > Fragment identifier considerations: N/A > Security considerations: as per RFC8392 > Contact: IETF COSE WG > Author/Change controller: IESG > > (I was writing an ID for this, then realized that application/cwt was > already a thing, and that all we needed was a suffix, which is Expert Review)
We already have it in https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-rats-eat-media-type-02.html#section-6.1, which is a handy place if we need a stable reference for the registration. If that is not necessary, we'd be happy to consume a registration done directly to IANA, as long as it completes in the same timeline as the EAT media-types document -- which is going to enter WGLC pretty soon. cheers! -- Thomas _______________________________________________ COSE mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose
