On Sat, Apr 8, 2023 at 2:44 AM Michael Richardson <[email protected]> wrote: > Yeah, I had looked at that awhile ago, but I did forget about it. > I don't think its accurate to put it there, and I think it needs to reference > RFC8392 not an EAT document. And we can do it with Expert Review. > If you want to keep it there, then let's do that.
OK, we'll keep it there for now. If someone does the registration in the meantime, we'll drop it. And if you think there are inconsistencies with the request in §6.1 of EAT media types, feel free to file a PR. Cheers, thanks! -- Thomas _______________________________________________ COSE mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose
