I support this request. Happy to help if I can.
OS On Fri, Apr 7, 2023, 11:50 AM Michael Richardson <[email protected]> wrote: > > Name: application/cwt > +suffix: +cwt > References: rfc8392 > Encoding considerations: CBOR is always encoded as binary > Interoperability considerations: None > Fragment identifier considerations: N/A > Security considerations: as per RFC8392 > Contact: IETF COSE WG > Author/Change controller: IESG > > (I was writing an ID for this, then realized that application/cwt was > already a thing, and that all we needed was a suffix, which is Expert > Review) > > > -- > Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) > Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide > > > > > _______________________________________________ > COSE mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose >
_______________________________________________ COSE mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose
