In a message dated 00-03-03 11:55:15 EST, you write:

> Hi all,  I am in for my annual and my AI wants me to replace my
Eisemann's.
>  They work fine but he is wondering how much longer.     He suggested
buying
>  bendix but everone with coupes seems to buy Slicks.
>
>  Is it still possible to have my eisemann's rebuilt or do you recommend
that
>  I buy a new set of either bendix or slicks.
>
The thing about aircraft parts is that if properly maintained, they're
pretty
much good as new.  So as long as they're really in good shape, then I
wouldn't worry.  They've held up this long.  If you're A&P has a
particular
gripe, he should tell you (like "They all fail from metal fatigue at XXXX
hours".  If so, they'd have a life limit).  If on the other hand, they're
in
lousy shape and need new shafts, coils, magnets, bushings, etc. just to be
airworthy, then you're looking at the economics of repairing them vs the
cost
to replace.

I personally would not buy a new Bendix mag.  As far as I know, they come
with a pre-existing list of recurring AD's.  Not what I'd expect from a
brand
new mag.  On the other hand, I wouldn't get rid of a perfectly good Bendix
mag, either, unless again, the economics of repairing it were prohibitive.
In either case I would not spend the price of a new Slick to repair an old
Eisemann or Bendix (or Slick, for that matter).

BTW, about 20 years ago Slick's reputation went in the dumper.  The mags
they
were building were designed to be used for about 1000 hours and then
discarded.  This did not go over too well, and probably wasn't a good
strategy.  (Musta been some Detriot influence.)  Lately, however, they
have
been producing a quality product with maintainability designed in.  Their
current product does not deserve the same rap.

Flame on
JohnO

---------------------------------
to unsubscribe send mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_____________________________________________________________
Want to find the best email lists? Check out the Topica 20!
http://www.topica.com/topica20

<<attachment: winmail.dat>>

Reply via email to