While I'm not advocating the use of "nonstandard" parts don't get lulled
into the mistaken belief that standard or authorized parts are superior or
for that matter even safe. A case in point is the exhaust header purchased
by a friend from a well  known parts supplier (a PMA supplier). It met all
the requirements by the FAA but when installed turned his plane into a
death trap. On takeoff I had a passenger with me and he was solo and I
nearly ran over him. His climbout was only about 100-150 FPM. When we
landed the new header was removed and given a careful inspection. A small
lip was found where the pipes were welded together. Didn't look like much
but was enough to rob him of roughly 30-40% power. Enough to get you
killed
on a takeoff.  After returning it 3 times and being told there was no
problem he fixed the problem himself. Not legal but safer. I myself
purchased and replaced a back spinner plate from one company several times
before the company acknowledged they knew of the defect and fixed the
problem. The stories are endless. Personally I place no faith in PMA
parts,
I use them when I am sure they are safe otherwise I will make do with
alternatives. AI are well meaning but not infallible, I've had my mags
timed 180 degrees out by an AI and been told in no uncertain circumstances
could auto fuel be used in an aircraft engine by another, never mind the
mogas STC and several hundred hours I already had flown. Lets face it if
your car was as subject to as many problems as an airplane you would junk
it. Remember that there are quite a few auto parts flying that have had an
appropriate AC # painted on them, of course you pay 2-3 times as much for
them as you would for one you bought at PEP Boys but just think how much
safer you feel with that number on there. The reality is that if it were
not for the insurance issue a lot more pilots would be flying alternative
parts. Face it. it's seldom a safety issue but an insurance issue

<<attachment: winmail.dat>>

Reply via email to