On 2002.02.18 00:21 Juha Saarinen wrote: > On Sun, 17 Feb 2002, David M. Stowell wrote: > > > Call it me, but has anyone looked at this guy's DNS records? I > just did > > (using dig) and things look a bit strange up there to me. > > They look all right to me. > > # dig pac10fans.com. mx > > ; <<>> DiG 8.3 <<>> pac10fans.com. mx > ;; res options: init recurs defnam dnsrch > ;; got answer: > ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 4 > ;; flags: qr aa rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 4, ADDITIONAL: > 5 > ;; QUERY SECTION: > ;; pac10fans.com, type = MX, class = IN > > ;; ANSWER SECTION: > pac10fans.com. 1D IN MX 1 mail.pac10fans.com. > > ;; AUTHORITY SECTION: > pac10fans.com. 1H IN NS ns1.mydomain.com. > pac10fans.com. 1H IN NS ns2.mydomain.com. > pac10fans.com. 1H IN NS ns3.mydomain.com. > pac10fans.com. 1H IN NS ns4.mydomain.com. > > ;; ADDITIONAL SECTION: > mail.pac10fans.com. 1D IN A 24.24.202.102 > ns1.mydomain.com. 5M IN A 216.148.213.141 > ns2.mydomain.com. 5M IN A 216.148.221.142 > ns3.mydomain.com. 5M IN A 216.148.213.143 > ns4.mydomain.com. 5M IN A 216.148.221.144
I didn't get the MX record on my query. That was the main oddness. Also, I didn't check, but nameservers called "ns_.mydomain.com" looked strange, even if they really exist (which I'm sure they do). My suggestion to get experienced help on site still stands. David M. Stowell Ravenslake Consulting Chicago, IL _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
