> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Gordon > Messmer > Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 8:10 PM > To: Courier-Users > Subject: Re: [courier-users] Re: fam, IDLE, and 0.40.1 delay > > > On Thu, 2003-02-13 at 15:16, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > > Well, it's obviously an NFS issue. I do understand that > FAM has some > > special code for NFS. As I understand it, FAM runs on both > the client and > > the server, and the FAM daemon on the client talks to the > server, and the > > NFS server (which should see the FS as an ordinary local > FS) proxies FAM > > requests on behalf of the client, avoiding the entire > UID/GID mapping mess. > > This should happen automatically. > > Documentation suggests that if FAM isn't available on the NFS server, > the FAM deamon on the NFS client will poll the dirs for changes. In > that case, the no_root_squash option would be necessary. > > This will be a common configuration, as Red Hat systems don't > currently > install FAM by default (unless you ask for GNOME).
I'm not getting very far with this one. The NFS client does not run imapd, therefore nothing will resister with fam, therefore it should not be an NFS issue. So, limiting myself to just the NFS/Courier server, I've tried several things tonite, but am unable to even reproduce the delays. My connections are the only imap things running, though. I'll see what it looks like Monday when the normal amount of imap stuff is going on... jerry ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
