On Tue, 11 Mar 2003 04:03:03 +0800 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 03/10/03 > at 01:50 PM, Anti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > >[snip] > >> > >> OK, I'll try building from source -- I was actually trying to update > >> the port manually. > > > >yes if you just force the port to use the new source without the other > >necessary changed it'll fail on that... > > There is a lot more out-of-date (or jsut plain wrong) with that port. For > example it can build obsolete copies of postgresql (and other htings) > right over top of running newer ones. Bad scene!
yeah that port is horribly done... among other annoying things it uses a "--with-userdb" but no "--enable-userdb" so userdb doesn't work... and i don't care for interactive ports to start with... etc... i'd rewrite it good but i'm not the maintainer so doubt it would get in anyway... ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
