In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 03/10/03 at 02:18 PM, Anti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>On Tue, 11 Mar 2003 04:03:03 +0800 >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 03/10/03 >> at 01:50 PM, Anti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >> >> >> >[snip] >> >> >> >> OK, I'll try building from source -- I was actually trying to update >> >> the port manually. >> >> >> >yes if you just force the port to use the new source without the other >> >necessary changed it'll fail on that... >> >> There is a lot more out-of-date (or jsut plain wrong) with that port. For >> example it can build obsolete copies of postgresql (and other htings) >> right over top of running newer ones. Bad scene! >yeah that port is horribly done... among other annoying things it uses a >"--with-userdb" but no "--enable-userdb" so userdb doesn't work... and i >don't care for interactive ports to start with... etc... i'd rewrite it >good but i'm not the maintainer so doubt it would get in anyway... Trust me, you 'rewrite it good' and (providing it tests OK) we'll find a way to get it in... Sam ain't making changes for pure sport.... We need to get current. Maintainers are volunteers. Time to pass the baton. Regards, Bill Hacker -- ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
