On Fri, 10 Oct 2003, Miguel Cabe�a wrote: > Jon, > > I think you didn't understand what I wrote.
No, I understood perfectly. > Let me make a drawing: > > Client Server > --- imap ---> imapd with STLS (xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:143)---> mail > --- pop3 ---> pop3d with STLS (xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:110) ---> mail > --- imaps ---> imapd-ssl (xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:993) ---> mail > --- pop3s ---> pop3d-ssl (xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:995) ---> mail > --- https ---> apache with mod_ssl (webmail) (xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:443) > ---> imap ---> imapd without STLS > (127.0.0.1:143)---> mail > > Every connection from the outside clients must be secure, but there is > no need for this requirement for local connections from webmail client > to localhost. I'm *forcing* imapd to accept only secure connections. > If webmail is to use imap i have two alternatives: use a secure > connection of existing imap server (more unecessary overhead), or i > can lauch another imap server without security on localhost to serve > only webmail connections. I suggest the first alternative. Why is that so hard? -- Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on what to have for dinner. Liberty is two wolves attempting to have a sheep for dinner and finding a well-informed, well-armed sheep. Jon Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> C and Python Code Gardener ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
