Like everything else I think it depends on the scale of the problem... If you've got the latest computer and 100 users, no...
If you've got a 2 year old computer serving hundreds or thousands BUSY users, every little bit helps. encryption generally speaking is an expensive process - that's why people offload it to encryption appliances etc. m/ -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jon Nelson Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 11:00 AM Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [courier-users] Running three instances of imapd On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Mitch \(WebCob\) wrote: > Because if the server has volume WHY load it up with useless overhead? Is /webmail/ over SSL that much more intensive than the same over a non-encrypted channel? -- Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on what to have for dinner. Liberty is two wolves attempting to have a sheep for dinner and finding a well-informed, well-armed sheep. Jon Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> C and Python Code Gardener ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
