On Fri, 10 Oct 2003, Miguel Cabe�a wrote: > Jon, > > > Client Server > > --- imap ---> imapd with STLS (xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:143)---> mail > > --- pop3 ---> pop3d with STLS (xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:110) ---> mail > > --- imaps ---> imapd-ssl (xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:993) ---> mail > > --- pop3s ---> pop3d-ssl (xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:995) ---> mail > > --- https ---> apache with mod_ssl (webmail) (xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:443) > > ---> imap ---> > imapd without STLS(127.0.0.1:143)---> mail > > >> I suggest the first alternative. Why is that so hard? > > These are not alternatives! I have them all available to the users.
You said (and I quote): """ If webmail is to use imap i have two alternatives: use a secure connection of existing imap server (more unecessary overhead), or i can lauch another imap server without security on localhost to serve only webmail connections. """ I followed that with (quote): """ I suggest the first alternative. Why is that so hard? """ Whatever. This discussion is going nowhere. Don't bother replying to me, I'm likely not interested. Don't take that as an insult, it's not a personal attack, I'm just not interested in the problem anymore. -- Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on what to have for dinner. Liberty is two wolves attempting to have a sheep for dinner and finding a well-informed, well-armed sheep. Jon Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> C and Python Code Gardener ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
