On Wed, 2004-05-19 at 05:47, Gordon Messmer wrote: > If you don't define an [EMAIL PROTECTED] account at all, the mail will be > rejected during the SMTP session. You don't have to deal with floods of > incoming mail to invalid addresses, and you won't have to deal with > unnecessary DSNs, either.
In my case, if I didn't have a .courier-default file the mail would be rejected during SMTP; but I need a way to support sendmail's user extension (ie [EMAIL PROTECTED]). The only way I can see to do that is using .courier-default to deliver to a program which prints the final delivery address (ie [EMAIL PROTECTED]). That works but has the unfortunate side-effect of causing all email, even for [EMAIL PROTECTED], to be accepted. I wish there was a better way of solving this. I have to say, I've pooh-poohed sendmail as unnecessarily complex, but this is exactly the sort of problem which is trivial in sendmail. I'm just about ready to modify submit to make it handle the problem! ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: SourceForge.net Broadband Sign-up now for SourceForge Broadband and get the fastest 6.0/768 connection for only $19.95/mo for the first 3 months! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=2562&alloc_id=6184&op=click _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
