Jay Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Julian Mehnle said: > > If it's a cost issue, run just one (i.e. drop the differently > > configured secondary MX). That's what I actually do. > > Have you ever had issues with downtime or lost mail?
Nothing where a secondary MX would have helped. Martijn Lievaart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I run the same configuration since a few months. One mailserver, ditched > the backup MXes for the same reasons stated here. I have had troubles > with mail (o.a. mail server crashed while I was on holiday, it was down > for two days). The main issue is that mailinglists can be quite > sensitive. You will loose mailinglist mail. Other than that no big > problems occur. The sending servers do exactly the same function as your > backup MX would, they store the mail for a reasonable time and notify > the sender if it cannot be delivered. "You will lose mailinglist mail"? Huh?? I never had such a problem. Why would that happen? ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc. Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
